Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 780M

AMD Radeon 780M

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated GPU in the Ryzen 7040 series for laptops (Phoenix, e.g. Ryzen 9 7940HS). The iGPU is based on the new RDNA3 architecture and has 12 CUs (= 768 shaders) clocked at up to 3 GHz (depending on the CPU model). As the predecessor Radeon 680M, the 780M supports hardware raytracing, although the performance is too slow to use it in current games.

Thanks to the new architecture and higher clock speeds, the Radeon 780M should be clearly faster then the old Radeon 680M. This means most demanding games should be playable in minimum graphics settings (like Cyberpunk 2077) and less demanding games like Fifa 23 can be played in higher settings and resolutions (1080p). In early 2023, the Radeon 780M is the fastest iGPU on the market.

Thanks to the modern 4nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD). The whole chip of the first two models can be configured between 15 - 54 Watt TDP.

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M compare 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M compare 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
Pipelines768 - unified
TMUs48
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed1500 - 3000 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement05.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
PredecessorRadeon 680M
CPU in Radeon 780MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS8 x 4000 MHz, 35 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS8 x 4000 MHz, 35 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS8 x 3800 MHz, 35 W? MHz2700 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2700 - 2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.4 pt (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1707     avg: 2873     median: 2939 (8%)     max: 3274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1496     avg: 2579     median: 2627 (7%)     max: 2910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4187     avg: 6772     median: 6857 (12%)     max: 7769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4550     avg: 7310     median: 7432.5 (8%)     max: 8370 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2548     avg: 4483     median: 4780 (6%)     max: 5465 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7732     avg: 11537     median: 11819 (16%)     max: 13156 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7868     avg: 11796     median: 11930.5 (10%)     max: 13351 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 120.9     avg: 184.6     median: 191.7 (11%)     max: 235 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 179.6     median: 153.8 (4%)     max: 289 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 6.7     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 22.2 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 23660     avg: 28208     median: 27267.5 (8%)     max: 31921 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 21515     avg: 29109     median: 29493.5 (10%)     max: 33582 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.2     avg: 54.3     median: 52.5 (7%)     max: 73.7 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34     avg: 54.5     median: 51.2 (7%)     max: 79.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 38.2     avg: 54.1     median: 52.3 (11%)     max: 79.8 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (51%)     max: 0.688 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3947     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (46%)     max: 0.658 fps per Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
56 68 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50 61 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 41 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
122
101
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
22.4 24.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.6 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.3 20.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
38.7
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
24 33.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.4 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7 17.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.3 9.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
3.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
58.3
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
87.9 89.6 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.6 71.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.8 58.1 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.7 53.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
154.3
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
43 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 39 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 28 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
62
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
101.2 107.8 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.6 98.4 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73 78.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.6 71.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
169.1
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
102.4 134.8 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67.4 96.2 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.7 61.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 38.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
126.1
167.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
36.1 44.6 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.5 35.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.8 28.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
74.1
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
51 54 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.2 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.3 37.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
90.2
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45
low 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
44.9 58.9 69.9 73.2 75.3 79.4 83.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.9 52.4 63.4 64.5 67 70.6 75.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.1 38.9 43.7 44.1 48.1 51.6 52.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
127.3
74.7
123.1
108.5
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93.1
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Epic Preset + Ray Tracing 1920x1080
8.7
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
22 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 27 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
42
low 1920x1080
29.8 35.2 37.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.9 24.8 26.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.7 19.4 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.7 14.8 14.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
52.6 52.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.2 42.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.9 36.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.6 32 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
91
low 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
47 62.3 65.4 68.9 75.3 77 77.6 80.4 80.6 82.6 86.6 94.2 94.6 99.8 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.5 52.7 59.3 62.1 67.5 68.3 68.4 70.2 72.5 72.9 77.9 83.6 85.7 88.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.7 40.2 42.6 45.3 50.3 50.5 50.5 52 54.2 55.2 57.9 62.2 63 66.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9 11.4 12.8 13.9 15.1 17.7 18.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
133.5
152.8
100.4
151.3
166.2
85.4
143.8
121.8
164.2
133.2
106.1
112.5
low 1920x1080
84.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
34.3 44.3 55.8 60.4 62.6 71.6 72 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.4 28.6 39.9 44.8 46.8 52 53.3 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.6 21.4 27.5 30.4 33.3 37.1 37.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5 17.2 23.9 25.2 27.1 30 30.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
116.9
131.4
128.4
140.6
111.8
62.6
87.8
low 1920x1080
22 26.3 26.7 30 38 38.6 39.3 39.5 42 43.9 44.6 53.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16 20.7 20.8 25 29.9 30.2 30.9 31.2 34 34.6 36.3 42 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 15.1 17.3 20 24 24.4 24.4 24.6 25 26.9 28.6 30.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2 15.9 22.3 23 23.3 24.8 25.2 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
75
88.6
56.7
71.5
65.5
43.1
43
low 1920x1080
106.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
141.6
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
27.5 34.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.5 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.9 22.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8 17.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
52.8
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
80 83 84.1 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43 45.1 48 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37 37.9 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
50
53.1
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
112.6 163.3 169.6 182.4 190.3 197.8 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.9 73.2 81.9 84.8 93.7 96.2 102.4 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.6 55.4 64.2 65.1 69.9 75.4 78.4 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 24.6 26.6 27.6 31.5 31.5 32.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
90.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
70
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
106.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
81.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
94.1 97 100 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36 39.8 43 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 36.3 38 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 31.2 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
62
67
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
83.3 130.5 138.9 139.8 139.8 141.9 145.5 147.5 147.6 148.8 150.4 162.3 163.2 165.3 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.3 53.8 58.5 59.7 59.8 59.9 60.6 61.1 61.5 62.4 64.8 65.4 65.6 67.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.9 45.3 49.4 49.5 49.6 49.8 50.5 50.7 52.5 52.8 54.8 55.6 55.8 58 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25 37.3 41.3 41.7 42.8 43 43.3 43.4 45.2 45.4 46.3 48.2 48.2 49.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 48 53 58 62 69 71 72 73 74 75 80 84 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 28 34 35 35 38 39 39 41 43 45 45 50 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 26 32 32 32 36 36 37 39 40 41 42 46 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21 24 29 30 30 35 35 35 36 37 39 40 44 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
51
42
low 1280x720
40 43.5 45.9 48.8 48.8 49.1 50.3 50.8 54.1 55 57.8 60 60.3 60.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.6 29.9 33.1 35.6 36.6 37 37.3 37.5 38.4 39.3 43 43.5 44.1 44.4 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4 28.2 29 29.1 29.7 29.9 30.3 31.8 32.2 32.8 36.5 36.5 37.5 37.5 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.8 50.5 56.6 57.7 62.6 66.6 66.6 69.7 70.6 71.3 75.2 76.5 77.6 78.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 27.4 30.5 32.7 33.3 34.2 34.3 34.4 35.2 35.7 37.4 38.2 38.7 38.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9 21.2 22.5 24.1 24.4 25 25.7 25.9 26 26.7 27.7 28.5 28.9 29.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
110.4 116.5 119.3 122.7 127.2 128.1 134.1 142 148.3 148.3 150.2 154.1 156.9 160.6 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
89.6 94.9 96 101.4 101.5 105.8 108.4 110.1 116.1 117.7 119.3 120.7 121.1 123.9 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.9 62.7 66.7 66.8 69 73.8 75.9 76.2 77.9 85.6 88.9 89.9 95.1 95.5 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.5 57 61.4 62 62.6 64.6 71.2 71.6 71.6 75.5 79.2 80.3 85.5 85.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
74 109.8 117.3 119 129 131 135.1 136.2 140 142 148.1 148.9 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75.3 85 85.2 85.9 97.1 101.5 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 34.9 36.1 39 40 42 43 43.3 45 45.9 47.2 49 50 50.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 20.4 22.2 24 25.2 26.1 26.3 26.4 27.5 28.1 28.7 29.8 30.5 31.5 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
11
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
51.7
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
91.6 100.5 126.9 136.1 137.5 139.3 145.8 153 157.3 157.8 160.8 164.7 166 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.2 122.2 125.9 133.7 134.7 146 147.2 147.2 156.1 158.4 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.5 50.1 52.6 53.9 56.3 56.8 58.6 58.8 59.5 59.7 63.6 68.3 68.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2 19.5 20.4 21 21 22.3 23.6 25.7 26 26 26.2 27.5 27.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
117.6
128
77.1
132.3
102.2
106.6
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
113.4
125.4
72.9
129.1
108.1
107.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023625641362815
Alan Wake 2232120135.98
Lords of the Fallen29231511.783.4
Total War Pharaoh8970514422.110.6
Assassin's Creed Mirage443936282011
EA Sports FC 2410594765651.726.8
Counter-Strike 21198248302711.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty40322626.316.37.16
Lies of P5346403724.211.9
The Crew Motorfest35332724
Starfield30.726.321.319.1
Armored Core 650.341.236.730.3
Immortals of Aveum2521.419.2
Atlas Fallen31.529.226.421.7
Baldur's Gate 330.922.921.98
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart23.922.215.7
F1 236962448.87
Diablo 450.543.938.638
Star Wars Jedi Survivor22.72018.316.6
Dead Island 251.845.231.427.3
The Last of Us24.818.615.212.9
Resident Evil 4 Remake25.319.916.9
Company of Heroes 369.548.936.635.7
Sons of the Forest32.821.119.819.4
Atomic Heart40.432.619.115.6
Returnal27252319
Hogwarts Legacy34241914
Dead Space Remake23.622.518.717.7
The Witcher 3 v4.005340342821.310.5
High On Life55.433.92920.6
The Callisto Protocol31.52118.111.8
Need for Speed Unbound39.23224.920.3
Spider-Man Miles Morales34.430.626.323.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202249453330
A Plague Tale Requiem19.416.714.512.1
The Quarry37.227.822.315.6
F1 2278695214
Vampire Bloodhunt84.354.246.443.2
Ghostwire Tokyo32.631.931.330.4
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands57422924
Cyberpunk 2077 1.63729232215.86.42
GRID Legends106.1816146.7
Dying Light 222.919.618
Rainbow Six Extraction65484533
God of War31262015
Far Cry 682453933
F1 2021169846427
Watch Dogs Legion72413318
Borderlands 390.445.22923.4
Control106.135.927.917.48.11
Far Cry New Dawn70424037
Metro Exodus81.132.22520.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider97403530
Strange Brigade14360504332.716.9
Far Cry 56738353329
X-Plane 11.11523832
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark66342511.4
Dota 2 Reborn1371097770
The Witcher 312888422620.815.2
GTA V1411365723
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
11
24
19
5
18
30
10
1
31
25
4
34
18
1
14
2

15


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.26
log 16. 00:07:00

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:14:47 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11564 +0.036s ... 0.077s

#7 got single benchmarks 11564 +0.052s ... 0.129s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.762s ... 0.892s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.296s ... 1.188s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.188s

#12 Got 855 rows for game benchmarks. +0.117s ... 1.304s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.304s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.044s ... 1.349s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +2.243s ... 3.592s

#16 return log +0.038s ... 3.63s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 780M graphics card

HP Pavilion Plus 14 Ryzen 7 laptop review: Changes in all the right places

HP Pavilion Plus 14 Ryzen 7 laptop review: Changes in all the right places

Last year's Core i7-12700H was fast, but the switch to Zen 4 has done wonders to battery life and efficiency without needing to sacrifice performance. The OLED ...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4

We've already reviewed the current ThinkPad T14s G4 with the Intel processor and high-resolution OLED panel, and now we have the AMD model with the Ryzen 7 7840...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G8 AMD Review - Custom Zen4 CPU meets great 2.9K OLED

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G8 AMD Review - Custom Zen4 CPU meets great 2.9K OLED

Lenovo’s brand-new Yoga Slim 7 14 G8 is a very interesting 14.5-inch subnotebook equipped with custom AMD Zen4 processors including Radeon 780M and a new 2.9K O...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.50" | 1.3 kg
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power gaming handheld in test

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power gaming handheld in test - Zen4 Power for your pocket

The Ayaneo Air 1S is so small that it probably fits in most pockets. Nevertheless, the Asian manufacturer manages to pack more than enough computing power for t...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | AMD Radeon 780M | 5.50" | 443.8 g
Acer Swift Edge 16 Ryzen 7 7840U laptop review: Zen 4 CPU and 3.2K 120 Hz OLED boost

Acer Swift Edge 16 Ryzen 7 7840U laptop review: Zen 4 CPU and 3.2K 120 Hz OLED boost

The Acer Swift Edge 16 is one of the lightest 16-inch laptops in the market right now with the new Ryzen 7 7840U. There's no doubt that its CPU and 120 Hz OLED ...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | AMD Radeon 780M | 16.00" | 1.2 kg

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U review: So much better than the Intel version

HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook 845 G10 review: Business laptop impresses with AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and unbeatable price

Beelink SER7: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.6 kg
  Review » Beelink SER7 mini PC review: Ryzen 7 7840HS with vapor chamber cooling

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook 845 G10 review: The almost perfect business laptop with AMD Zen4

  Review » Testing the performance of AMD Radeon 780M & 760M iGPUs with new drivers

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 0.7 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro review: Better than its competitors thanks to an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and a Radeon 780M

Beelink GTR7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 0.9 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS performance debut: Beelink GTR7 mini PC review

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Review - Gaming handheld with 120 Hz display and AMD Zen4

: , 0.00"
  Review » AMD Radeon 780M iGPU analysis - AMD's new RDNA-3 GPU takes on its competitors

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 14.00"
  Review » AMD Radeon 780M iGPU analysis - AMD's new RDNA-3 GPU takes on its competitors

  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS analysis - Zen4 Phoenix is ideally as efficient as Apple

Lenovo Legion Go: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Go

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2023: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2023

Acer Swift Edge SFE16-43: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 16.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFE16-43

Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 6

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7840S, 14.50", 1.3 kg
   » Yoga Slim 7 vs. Yoga Pro 7 - The fight for Lenovo's best 14-inch subnotebook

HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » HP's EliteBook 845 G10 is the better choice with the slower AMD Zen4 processor

HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » AMD Zen4 for the office: HP EliteBook 845 G10 convinces with bright display and great keyboard

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 7.00", 0.6 kg
   » ASUS ROG Ally: Executive confirms gamers can hold off on troublesome recent BIOS update

   » ASUS ROG Ally: Pre-orders open with cheaper AMD Ryzen Z1 model to follow

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Arc A750

Class 2

M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon 780M GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-01-10)